<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: Call of Duty 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/</link>
	<description>Videogame enthusiasts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dalagonash</title>
		<link>http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalagonash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I pretty much agree with this review, even though I didn&#039;t find the story that great. In truth I just saw it as a reason to go an shoot some stuff, although the story telling near the beginning, you know the bit, was really well done.

Multi is very good, even if I do prefer Halo&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree with this review, even though I didn&#8217;t find the story that great. In truth I just saw it as a reason to go an shoot some stuff, although the story telling near the beginning, you know the bit, was really well done.</p>
<p>Multi is very good, even if I do prefer Halo&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Nice one Andy. For me, the success of the story, the graphics and the &quot;feel&quot; of the game carried it through to become one of my highlights of the year, but I&#039;m sure we will look back and curse the respawning enemies and the AI. Plus I&#039;m shithouse at the multi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Andy. For me, the success of the story, the graphics and the &#8220;feel&#8221; of the game carried it through to become one of my highlights of the year, but I&#8217;m sure we will look back and curse the respawning enemies and the AI. Plus I&#8217;m shithouse at the multi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jevan</title>
		<link>http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressstartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/review-call-of-duty-4/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Good review, presstartblog. ;)

It sums up my own thoughts very well. It&#039;s a very good game, but for all its visual splendor, it does seem to be living in the past a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review, presstartblog. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It sums up my own thoughts very well. It&#8217;s a very good game, but for all its visual splendor, it does seem to be living in the past a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
